Computed under the executed Addendum, effective 31 August 2026.
The Amended & Restated Unified Commission Addendum between MAJB Solutions LLC and Nikola Vujicic is signed by both
parties with an effective date of 31 August 2026. Every figure on this page follows it: A2 one-time rates,
A3 recurring eligibility, A4 tiered rates on recurring profit, the A5 monthly closing gate, and Section B for
Reliable Innovations. Pay runs semi-monthly on the 1st and 15th for cash collected in the preceding period (C4).
Revision note. An earlier version of this page computed a flat 35% of gross. It was published while the only
copies available carried a blank effective date and unsigned signature blocks, which led to the conclusion that no
addendum was in force. The executed copy has since been supplied and that conclusion is withdrawn.
Owed, Sep 1–15
$330.56
A4 $259.56 + A2 $21.00 + Section B $50.00
Owed, August
$419.34
A4 $314.37 + A2 one-time $104.97
Total owed
$749.90
His updated tracker, reconciled to the executed Addendum
A5 gate
75%
4 personal closes in Aug, 3 in Sept
Basis — the executed Addendum, reconciled against his tracker
Amended & Restated Unified Commission Addendum · effective 2026-08-31 · signed by both parties
Figures below follow the executed document and are cross-checked against Nikola's updated tracker, which now sets out his
own calculation method. Where the two read a clause differently, both readings are shown.
His update caught two deals this page had missed — Richard Kaiser and Ian Davis, both with verified cash —
which raised the total. He has also correctly adopted Section B's flat $50 for Home Healthcare.
A4 recurring — deals he personally closed
Recurring profit = gross collected − direct hard delivery cost. A3 pays recurring only on deals Nikola personally closed. All his leads are inbound, so the first-tier inbound rate is 42%.
| Client | Cash cleared | Gross | Profit | ×42% | ×75% gate |
|---|
| Richard Kaiser | 2026-08-09 | $200.00 | $175.00 | $73.50 | $55.13 |
| Geiver Monzon | 2026-08-10 | $200.00 | $175.00 | $73.50 | $55.13 |
| John Soriano | 2026-08-21 | $399.00 | $374.00 | $157.08 | $117.81 |
| Darryl Carter | 2026-09-06 | $200.00 | $175.00 | $73.50 | $55.13 |
| Richard Kaiser | 2026-09-09 | $200.00 | $175.00 | $73.50 | $55.13 |
| Ian Davis | 2026-09-01 | $499.00 | $474.00 | $199.08 | $149.31 |
| Andres Valenzuela | 2026-08-28 | $299.00 | $274.00 | $115.08 | $86.31 |
| A4 RECURRING — August $314.37 + September $259.56 | $573.93 |
|---|
A2 one-time — 3.5% company-closed
A3 pays no recurring on company-closed accounts, but A2 still pays the one-time fee at 3.5%. Nikola does not claim these. They are owed under the Addendum regardless.
| Client | Cash cleared | Closer | One-time | Payable |
|---|
| Victor Rios | 2026-08-10 | Branko | $750.00 | $26.25 |
| Dan Westermann | 2026-08-21 | Branko | $499.00 | $17.47 |
| Alex Wilson | 2026-08-31 | Alex / Branko | $750.00 | $26.25 |
| Andres Valenzuela | 2026-08-28 | Nikola | $500.00 | $35.00 |
| Ian Davis | 2026-09-01 | Nikola | $300.00 | $21.00 |
| A2 ONE-TIME — $56.00 inbound (7%) + $69.97 company-closed (3.5%) | $125.97 |
|---|
Section B — Reliable Innovations (Home Healthcare)
Flat $50.00 when Nikola sets or confirms an appointment and the deal closes and cash is collected. $0 otherwise.
One paying client to date: Linda Braggs, $1,000.00 cleared 2026-09-09 → $50.00.
Danielle Jackson's $1,000 is still pending in Stripe, so it earns nothing yet. Nikola's tracker applies the same
$50 treatment to both — his reading of Section B matches the executed document.
Where the two readings differ
| Point | Clause | His reading | Addendum as written |
|---|
| Delivery cost per client | A4 | $100/mo | ≈$25/mo (stated by Alex) |
| Recurring rate | A4 | 70% outbound | 42% inbound |
| Company-closed recurring | A3 | 50% of profit | $0 — setup fee only |
| One-time rate | A2 | 10% outbound | 7% inbound / 3.5% company-closed |
| Monthly closing gate | A5 | not applied | 75% this period |
| Home Healthcare | Section B | flat $50 | flat $50 — agreed |
The first four turn on whether his work is outbound or inbound. Alex has stated the leads are inbound, which sets
42% and 7%; his sheet applies the outbound rates. That single question drives most of the difference and is worth settling directly.
Open items
Not settled from data held here
- Outbound or inbound. Decides 70% vs 42% on recurring and 10% vs 7% on one-time.
- Delivery cost. $100/client/month in his sheet against ≈$25 here. Neither is evidenced by an invoice.
- A5 basis. Counted here as personally-closed deals whose cash cleared in the month — 3 in August, 3 in September, so 75%. Counting by conversion date instead would give a lower gate.
- Delivery cost definition. A4 names “software or data tools” as direct hard costs. The $25 used here is an allocation of a VA's salary, which is labour rather than tooling. If a VA does not qualify, the deduction is $0 and every recurring figure rises.
- Ian Davis — resolved. Stripe shows $799.00 collected 2026-09-01 (invoice 000040) and a separate $299.00 reversed on 2026-09-11. An earlier version of this page computed him off the $299, which was the reversed charge. Under C2 a reversed transaction earns nothing, so it is excluded entirely rather than netted. The $799 matches his tracker's $499 monthly + $300 one-time exactly; that split is taken from his tracker. No commission was ever paid on the reversed charge, so there is nothing to deduct under C2.
- Upcoming, not payable. Ian Davis has a new LinkedIn subscription starting 2026-10-03, next invoice $299.00. Commission is on cash actually collected, so nothing is owed on it until that charge clears.
Corrections carried forward
| Client | Was shown | True amount |
|---|
| Darryl Carter | $2 | $200 |
| John Soriano | $3.99 | $399 |
| Andres Valenzuela | $7.99 | $799 |
| Ian Davis | $7.99 | $799 |
C3 makes the CRM authoritative, but two CRM fields are demonstrably broken and are not used for money here: the GHL payment
column divides by 100 (printing $399 as $3.99), and an invoice-only reading misses GHL payment-link cash, which reaches Stripe
as a charge with no invoice attached. Geiver, Soriano and Carter were all verified directly against Stripe charges.
Commission earned in period
$0.00
Computed, not assumed
Qualifying closes
0
Closed and paid. $50 each under B1.
HH leads Nick tagged
17
Of 100 nikola-tagged contacts, 17 carry a home-health tag
HH cash collected in period
$0
No home-healthcare invoice paid Aug 31 – Sep 7
This zero is a real zero, and three sources agree
1. Stripe. All 14 invoices paid since the effective date are cleaning accounts. The nearest
home-health candidate, Reliable Aid Inc., last paid Aug 8 2026 — before the addendum took
effect, and it bills to alexdennery001@gmail.com, so it reads as an internal account
rather than a customer.
2. The HH pipeline. 41 opportunities, 13 booked, 0 closed, all deal values blank.
3. The nikola tag. 17 tagged home-health leads exist, so Nick is setting HH
appointments — but none of them appears as a paid Stripe customer.
Under B1 the $50 is earned only on cash collection. Confirmation, attendance and show status
earn nothing. Zero collections, zero fee. This is the only figure on this page that depends on no
missing input.
Entity mapping — confirmed in GHL, not guessed
The addendum has no section named “Home Healthcare”; Section B covers Reliable
Innovations. A GHL sub-account named “Reliable Innovations” exists, alongside
“Reliable Aid Inc.” and “Reliable Aid Marketing”. This tab treats Section B as
the home-healthcare terms. Confirm which of the three Reliable entities the addendum means
— they are not obviously the same business.
B1 — Reliable Innovations, as written
| Nick sets or confirms the appointment and the deal closes and pays | $50.00 |
| Appointment does not close, or payment is not collected | $0.00 |
Flat fee. No recurring of any kind. No tiers, no profit
calculation, no A5 gate.
Source
“Nikola V commisions”, Nick's own Google Sheet, read read-only 2026-09-07.
17 closed deals, 30 May → 1 Sep 2026. Columns: client, date of conversion, monthly, one-time pay,
a free-text note, and a “Montly Recurring Bonus” column.
It is a closed-deal log, not an appointment log. It does not resolve the 31 untagged
appointments on Branko's calendar, because Nick only records deals that converted.
Deals in his tracker
17
15 resolved to a billing identity, 2 unresolvable
Deal value he records
$7,044
$3,645 monthly + $3,399 one-time, as written by him
Cash confirmed collected
$4,353
Stripe invoices only — excludes GHL payment-link cash
Commission owed
$749.90
Executed Addendum, Aug + Sep 1–15, verified
Three-way reconciliation — tracker · nikola tag · billing
| Deal (his spelling) | Conv. | He records | His closer note |
Bonus | Tag | Stripe cash | Verdict |
|---|
How to read the table above
The “Stripe cash” column counts paid Stripe invoices only. Money taken through GHL payment links
reaches Stripe as a charge with no invoice attached, so it does not appear there. A $0 in that column
therefore means no invoice, not no cash — Geiver, Soriano and Andres are all in that position and all
three are confirmed collected. Commission is computed on the SMCB tab under the executed Addendum: $749.90 verified to date.
His tracker is the source for the deal, the amount and the closer.
Tie-out: $1,250 was collected in the window from clients attributed to Nick and $9,304 from clients
who are not, together the $10,554 Stripe collected between Aug 31 and Sep 7. Only the attributed
portion is itemised anywhere on this page.
Tag vs calendar — they measure different things
Measured over
Aug 8 – Sep 7 2026:
| Appointments on Branko's calendars, raw | 191 |
| … after removing Google Calendar mirror duplicates | 65 |
… of which the contact is tagged nikola | 34 (52%) |
| Appointments on Nick's own calendar | 1 |
So the calendar is not a setter signal. Nick set roughly half of everything Branko ran, and
almost none of it went through his own calendar. The earlier model — “setter calendar vs
inbound self-booking calendar” — does not hold. The correct reading is
the tag tells you who set it; the calendar tells you who closed it. They are complementary,
not competing, so there are no tag-vs-calendar contradictions to adjudicate — but 31 of 65 real
appointments carry no tag, and those need Nick to confirm whether he set them. His tracker does not
answer this: it logs closed deals, not appointments.
Mirror duplicates: 126 of 191 (66%). Any appointment count taken straight from GHL is roughly
3× overstated. Dedupe on contact + date before using it for anything.
Reading signature status correctly
GHL’s status field undercounts signed deals by 54%
| Documents in the SMCB location | 789 |
Signed — the client has signed (recipients[].hasCompleted) | 196 |
Documents showing status: completed | 91 |
Signed, but status still reads viewed or sent | 105 |
The rule, per Alex: a document is signed when the client has signed it. Nothing else is
required. status is not a signature field — it only reaches completed
once every recipient on the envelope has signed, so it lags the client signature and always will.
Read recipients[].hasCompleted and signedDate instead. On that basis
196 documents are signed, not 91.
Worked examples, all signed and all showing viewed: Victor Rios, Linkedin
Services Agreement, Aug 10. Alex Wilson, MSA and Addendum C, Aug 31. And — fittingly
— Nick’s own commission addendum, Aug 31, which is signed and counts as signed.
Why this hits commission: A5’s close-count gate scales the whole recurring payout.
Derive that count from status and it is understated by more than half, which can drop
the multiplier a band or two — or to zero. Never source a close count from
status.
Does the money tie out?
| Figure | This page | OPS billing dashboard | Ties? |
|---|
| Total collected, all time | $420,502.51 | $420,503 |
yes rounding only |
| Paid invoice count | 885 | 885 |
yes |
GHL vs Stripe — the delta
| Window | Stripe | GHL payments | Delta | GHL captures |
|---|
| All time (2022 – Sep 7 2026) | $420,502.51 | $138.49 |
$420,364.02 | 0.03% |
| Commission period | $10,554.00 | $7.99 |
$10,546.01 | 0.08% |
The single GHL payment inside the commission period (Ian Davis, $7.99) does not appear in Stripe at all.
The two systems overlap on nothing in this window. Separately, only 241 of 851 GHL invoices reconcile to
Stripe — 28%.
Two further defects found in the OPS dashboard
1. The “30d Paid” column multiplies GHL payments by 100
| Contact | Actual GHL payment | Shown as 30d Paid |
|---|
| Ian Davis | $7.99 | $799 |
| Andres Valenzuela | $5.00 + $2.99 = $7.99 | $799 |
| John Soriano | $3.99 | $399 |
Cents are being read as dollars for GHL-sourced payments. Stripe rows in the same column are correct.
Never compute commission from the 30d Paid column — it would overpay by 100× on any
GHL-sourced line. This page uses paid Stripe invoices only.
2. The “COLLECTED (2026)” card is mislabelled
It shows $420,503, which is all 885 paid invoices back to January 2025. Collections dated in 2026 are
$185,447. The number is right; the label is wrong.
A conflict in the addendum that needs a decision
C3 names the CRM as sole source of truth
C3 makes the Company CRM authoritative for deal amounts and recurring revenue. GHL is that CRM and it
is wrong about money by roughly 3,000×. This page follows Stripe instead, because underpaying a
contractor is the worse error — but that is a deliberate departure from a signed document. C3
should be amended to name Stripe / the billing dashboard for cash, and keep the CRM authoritative only
for attribution (lead source, setter, closer) — which is the one thing it should be tracking and,
via the nikola tag, the one thing it actually does well.
If commission was ever paid off GHL numbers, money is owed
GHL has recorded $138.49 of payments in its entire history. Stripe has collected
$420,502.51. Any commission run that sourced payments from GHL would have paid on essentially
nothing. This section sizes what is attributable to Nick specifically.
Nick-tagged contacts who are Stripe customers
19
Of 100 tagged contacts
Collected from them, all time
$4,003
20 paid Stripe invoices
Visible in GHL
$0
None of these 20 invoices appears in GHL payments
Collected in the last 30 days
$3,001
75% of it is recent — exposure is growing
Nick-attributable collections invisible in GHL
| Client | Invoices | Collected | First | Last |
|---|
| Total | 20 | $4,003 | |
|---|
Nick's tracker narrows this considerably
His own log covers 17 deals, 30 May – 1 Sep. Cross-referenced against billing:
| Direction | Amount | Meaning |
|---|
| Cash collected on deals he logs | $4,353 | Invisible in GHL. If commission was ever computed from GHL, this is the base that was missed. |
| Deal value logged with no Stripe invoice behind it | $2,691 | Not a shortfall — GHL payment-link cash reaches Stripe as a charge with no invoice, so it is invisible to an invoice-only count. |
| Victor Rios understatement | $800 | He records $250; Stripe collected $1,050. Money he does not know he is owed. |
What this does and does not prove
It proves $4,003 of Nick-set business has been collected and is invisible in GHL. It does
not yet prove an underpayment, because that depends on two things not visible here: what Nick
has actually been paid to date, and whether those payments were computed from GHL or from Stripe. If
they came off GHL, the shortfall is real and the A2 rates apply to the $4,003 base — between $140
and $400 in setup-fee commission alone, before any recurring. Send the commission payment history
and the exact shortfall per client becomes a mechanical calculation. Note that most of this predates
the Aug 31 effective date, so the prior structure governs it.